Operational playbook

National Retail Chain — ORC Loss-Prevention Rollout

A 42-store national apparel retailer operating in both Ontario and Quebec was losing 3.1% of sales to shrink — predominantly organized-retail-crime crews working cross-store patterns. Previous vendor patchwork offered uniformed guards but no intelligence, no apprehension SOP and no documented recoveries.

Request a proposal

At a glance

Asset
42 stores across Ontario and Quebec
Provinces
Ontario (PSISA) + Quebec (BSP)
Contract type
Uniformed LP + plain-clothes LP + intelligence
Hours
~3,800 post-hrs/week at peak (Q4)
Deployed in
6 weeks phased rollout

The challenge

Shrink had doubled year-over-year. Merchandising saw the same suspect vehicle at three stores in 48 hours but had no way to share the photo. Stores were afraid of apprehensions because previous vendor agents had made unsafe detentions and the retailer's legal team had filed two matters. We needed to rebuild LP credibility while actually reducing shrink.

Our approach

Published apprehension SOP

A written apprehension SOP aligned with Criminal Code s.494 (citizen's arrest) that restricts action to specific grounds, mandates de-escalation-first, and prohibits pursuit into the parking lot. Every LP agent certifies to the SOP before first shift.

Plain-clothes + uniformed mix

Visible uniformed presence at entry (deterrence) plus plain-clothes agents on the floor (interdiction). Mix tuned per store based on shrink analytics and foot-traffic pattern.

Cross-store intelligence feed

Weekly intel bulletin shared across all 42 stores with suspect photos, vehicle plates, known MO and successful recovery notes. Integrated with the retailer's internal LP system and regional RCC network.

Evidence-grade incident packages

Every apprehension produces a package: CCTV clips, agent narrative, SKU list with values, witness statements, and police file reference — sufficient for Crown prosecution.

Monthly P&L review

LP report that ties recoveries and deterrence back to store-level shrink numbers so the CFO can see ROI, not just incident counts.

Outcome (first 9 months)

  • −61%
    Chain-wide shrink %
    3.1% → 1.2% of sales
  • $847,000
    Documented recoveries
    Merchandise recovered across the chain in 9 months
  • 24 cases
    Crown-prosecuted cases
    0 dismissals for procedural issues
  • 0
    Legal matters filed against LP agents
    vs. 2 in the prior year
  • 92%
    LP-staff retention
    vs. industry average ~50%

What we actually deployed

  • Uniformed LP agents at all 42 stores (entry-deterrence posture)
  • Plain-clothes LP agents at 18 highest-shrink stores (interdiction)
  • Regional LP managers (1 Ontario, 1 Quebec) with weekly intel bulletin
  • Apprehension SOP, de-escalation training and annual recertification
  • Monthly P&L report tied to store-level shrink

FAQ

Do you operate in both Quebec and Ontario under one contract?

Yes. We hold Ontario PSISA and Quebec BSP agency licences and deploy province-appropriate licensed agents under a single master service agreement, single point of contact, unified reporting and consolidated analytics.

What's the difference between uniformed and plain-clothes LP?

Uniformed agents deter; plain-clothes agents interdict. A best-practice mix varies by store — high-shrink flagships often run both, smaller stores run uniformed only.

How do you avoid wrongful-detention risk?

Every apprehension must satisfy the published SOP (which restricts action to Criminal Code s.494 grounds). When any element of the SOP is not met, the agent disengages and documents. We track near-misses and recalibrate training quarterly.

Have a similar problem? Let's talk.

Send us your context and we'll reply with a plan specific to your situation, backed by our PSISA and BSP licensing and $5M general liability coverage.