Operational playbook

3PL Distribution Centre — Cargo-Theft Reduction

A 500,000 sq-ft 3PL in the Mississauga industrial belt was losing an average of 2.3 trailer-level cargo incidents per month — a mix of seal breaches, driver-side diversion and after-hours dock-door tampering. Insurance had put the client on notice before renewal.

Request a proposal

At a glance

Asset
500,000 sq-ft 3PL distribution centre
Province
Ontario (PSISA), bonded warehouse
Contract type
24/7 gatehouse + yard patrol + dock supervision
Hours
336 post-hrs/week
Deployed in
18 business days (phased)

The challenge

Previous security was reactive: a single unarmed guard at the gate reading drivers' BOLs at a glance, no yard patrol, no dock oversight, no seal verification log. Two of the five most recent incidents had already resulted in insurance claims; the fifth was on video but nobody could produce a chain-of-custody incident report.

Our approach

Gatehouse SOP rewrite

Every inbound driver is now checked against a three-point protocol: government ID matches CDL, BOL matches gate pass, seal number matches the WMS expected value. Refusal process is written and drivers are rerouted without confrontation.

Yard audit cadence

Three photographed yard audits per day — shift-open, mid-shift, shift-close. Every trailer in the drop lot is verified against the yard management system; discrepancies become a 15-minute escalation.

Dock-door supervision

A guard is posted at the dock line during peak outbound, with after-hours dock-door alarm-response SLA of 10 minutes from dispatch. Seal photos are filed to the client's incident portal.

Evidence-grade reporting

Every seal breach, missing pallet or suspicious driver interaction produces an incident report within 60 minutes, with photos and CCTV-clip references — formatted for the insurer and the client's internal loss-prevention team.

Outcome (first 6 months)

  • −94%
    Trailer-level cargo incidents
    2.3/mo → 0.14/mo over months 4-6
  • −100%
    Insurance-claim incidents
    Zero new claims in the 6-month observation period
  • 99.8%
    Seal-verification audit pass rate
    vs. no documented rate prior
  • < 60 min
    Dispatch-to-report SLA
    For any seal or inventory anomaly

What we actually deployed

  • 24/7 gatehouse staffing (2 shifts + relief) — PSISA licensed
  • Dedicated dock-door guard during peak outbound windows
  • Marked yard-patrol vehicle with NFC checkpoints at trailer positions
  • Written gatehouse SOP, refusal procedure, and seal-verification log
  • Shift supervisor on-site 2x/day for spot audits

FAQ

Can you support a C-TPAT or PIP audit trail?

Yes. Our gatehouse logs, visitor register, seal verification records and CCTV retention are designed to produce the documentation an auditor expects for C-TPAT (US), PIP (CBSA) and AEO programs.

How do you handle a driver who refuses a seal check?

Written refusal procedure: the driver is re-directed to staging, the carrier's dispatcher is notified, and the load is held pending instruction. Nobody is confronted at the gate and no load leaves without verification.

What happens to the CCTV after an incident?

The incident report references the NVR clip with camera ID and timestamp; we coordinate with the client's IT team to pull and preserve the clip before auto-overwrite (often 14-30 days).

Have a similar problem? Let's talk.

Send us your context and we'll reply with a plan specific to your situation, backed by our PSISA and BSP licensing and $5M general liability coverage.